So, I recently found a great article about the “Perfect Distro.” The article was good, but what really impressed me was the number of good comments on the site. Inspired, I went on to post a very long comment, which I figured I would turn into a post here.
KDE is not so great now, but has the most potential of creating a mainstream(ish) distro. Ubuntu is pretty great. And the perfect distro is only as good as it’s programs.
The Perfect Distro
The Base/Package manager
I like Ubuntu. It has problems, but I love .deb and apt. An average user of windows/mac would never be installing from source code, and there’s no reason why we should have to. (Also, yum/.rpm don’t play as well with dependencies for my experience.)
Currently, I prefer Gnome, as it can be very nice looking, but, unlike KDE, it still feels practical. For me, KDE feels pretty, but a lot of features are pretty useless. (An always open window for desktop, Really? Why don’t we just the Desktop on the desktop?)
That said, we need something different than the norm, something we can say is only ours. Overall I think KDE, and more importantly, the KDE programs, hold our best hope for distinguishing ourself from the other big 2. (Course, it’s not on my computer yet, so i think it has a way to go before it fulfills its destiny.)
Docky is a good dock, but it’s still to much in it’s infancy to be a real contender. The other problem with that type of dock is when we use it, we run the risk of being called an OS-X knockoff. I think we need another way of showing off programs that is neither like windows, nor like OS-X. If we wish to create something truly innovative, we will need to thing outside the box of current Operating systems.
Same preaching here, something different blah blah blah. But seriously, some different and high quality fonts would be great. There are lots of good free fonts on the web, why don’t we just use the best of them?
I don’t like Click N Run, it reminds me too much of corporate online stores. But Get Deb is good, and I really like Linux Mints “app store” or whatever they call it.
Rules on Updating:
Strict Package updating rules. Very rarely update the core components. This is needed desperately.
OpenOffice is good, but in keeping with my “different” philosophy, I think KOffice would be better.
Miro is more of a video finder, but still should be included. VLC seems like a better all-around video player.
Moovida. Unless someone can offer a better solution.
I prefer Amarok, but Banshee is also a good player, it is not that important.
I agree this should be included in the distro.
From most complicated+ powerful to easiest+ weakest.
-Ardour is indeed very powerful, but not very user-friendly.
-Linux MultiMedia StudioLinux MultiMedia Studio is slightly easier to use, but less powerful, and still pretty hard to use.
-Rosegarden is the middle ground, and my pick for this category, for three reasons. First, It is powerful, but not as thorough as Ardour or LMMS. But this is okay, because (2) Rosegardens greatest strength is it’s fantastic ability to work well with other software. Finally, I it is approachable. Not completely intuitive, but I never felt like I couldn’t learn It.
-Jokosher I really want to like Jokesher, but the interface seems easy but very unintuitive, like an elite club that you feel like you would fit in well, but they aren’t interested in having any new members.
-Audacity is very easy to use, but it feels too much like a one trick application. It can edit audio well, and that is it.
-Pitivi is buggy and (relatively) featureless, but it seems like it has the most potential.
-Kdenlive is slighly more buggy, but currently it is more advanced and equally intuitive as Pitivi.
-OpenMovieEditor is buggy, less advanced than Kdenlive, but more advanced than Pitivi.
-There are others, like Cinerella or Kino, but those don’t seem intuitive enough for mass use.
Overall, it seems like a very close race for the top 3. I don’t know who will win the Linux Video Editor race, but the future looks pretty bright.
I think, if we want to jump start the progress of a software category, we should hold a contest with a cash prize for the best (judge+ community voted) of that category with a year deadline.
F-Spot is not bad, but Digikam is a much more powerful option. Unfortunately, Digikam has quite a few bugs and doesn’t feel as polished as it should be. The only other contender is Picassa, but it doesn’t have a real linux port, it only exists as self-contained WINE program.
For casual gamers, KDE has a nice set of games that I prefer to gnomes games. Linux has a nice set of games, you just have to know where to look. As I recall, linuxlinks.com had a nice list of them, but a bit of googling can turn up some other good ones.
I have used both Empathy and PidginPidgin, and even though pidgin occasionally gives me problems, I still prefer it to Empathy. The main reason is that the plugins are superior, but i also prefer the interface.
Firefox is the obvious choice.
But what if we think outside the box for a moment. Mac has Safari, Windows has IE, what other options do we have that’s relatively linux-only.
I am a big fan of Konquerer. There is something about it I really like, plus, it has add-block and other features that make it an appealing choice. That said, I still use Firefox. Take that for what you will.
I prefer Thunderbird to Evolution, but meh.
Well, now that we use KDE, we can use QT Creator. Also, this means no legal battles about MonoDevelop. Yay!
Installed by default. I like the idea of also having Air installed.
Overall, I think the best chance for Linux success comes from KDE and kde programs. If the developers for Kubuntu started doing things right (KDE is pretty, we know, now make it useful!), I think we could have a real winner.
Unrelated to the rest of the post, I think master-razorstrap has a good point (see the comments), that the best distro would be customizable for whoever uses it and they would choose what programs they want, maybe if we could use the live cd idea to demo software during the installation…..